Despite its
title, this book is not about the Battle of Hattin. Instead, it is a concise history of the
historical events that led up to the crushing defeat of the army of Jerusalem
by Saladin in 1187, and an equally concise discussion of the aftermath and
impact of Hattin right up to the present day. For anyone interested in understanding
the rhetoric about “crusades” in the context of today’s conflict with ISIS, the
Muslim Brotherhood, and al Qaida, this book is an incredibly useful starting
point.
“Hattin” is only
168 pages long, contains useful maps, a collection of interesting photographs
and a useful bibliography. Despite its brevity, on the whole it avoids over
simplification and the usual misrepresentations of basic facts. France, for
example, makes clear right on page 3 that “many parts of the Middle East,
especially those areas seized by the westerners, were not Muslim at all but
eastern Christian: their populations often welcomed the new rulers.” He
highlights the fact, so often forgotten or ignored today, that Muslim raiders
had burned St. Peter’s in Rome in 847 and draws attention to the very real
fear of Islamic expansion and conquest that shaped European attitudes right up
to the First Crusade. Yet he also notes that once the crusader states had been
established “the western settlers were far from fanatical, understanding the
importance of exploiting Muslim divisions.” (p.37)
France does a
remarkable job of making the complex and (particularly to Western eyes) very
confusing divisions and rivalries within the Muslim world comprehensible. He manages
to boil down the intrigues that led to Saladin’s seizure of power in Egypt to
the essentials, and likewise avoids the usual drivel about the barons of
Jerusalem being self-seeking and exceptionally greedy or perversely divided.
France notes soberly: “All aristocracies were inevitably divided by factional
struggles in which personal likes and dislikes played a major role.” (p.65) In
short, there was nothing particularly unique about this in the Kingdom of
Jerusalem, and nothing inherently fatal about it. France also highlights that “the
barons of Jerusalem were not, for the most part, fanatics…but they were
fiercely and proudly Catholic and deeply aware of the dangers posed by their
Muslim neighbours to their very existence…As a whole they were quite prepared
to deal peacefully with the Muslims, but they were also aware that they needed
to be strong….”
France does his
best to reconstruct the Battle of Hattin itself, but given the absence of
first-hand Christian accounts the task is nearly impossible. The contradictions
in later accounts written with the benefit of hindsight and designed to serve various
contemporary agendas and biases, make a variety of interpretations both
plausible and defensible. France’s account is no more than one plausible
interpretation, and he only devotes 15 pages to the battle itself. This is
completely justifiable as the book far from being about tactical details of no
particular relevance in the 21st century but rather about the impact of
Hattin both strategically and ideologically.
France’s most
valuable contribution to the literature on the crusades and Hattin is his last
chapter titled “Hattin Today: A Poisoned Heritage.” In this chapter he not only
traces and explains the emergence of the “chivalrous” Saladin myth in the 13th
and later centuries, he catalogues the various ways in which Saladin and Hattin
have been harnessed to modern ideologies and aspirations from the Ottoman
empire to ISIS. France argues, “the
European myth of Saladin arose from the desire among the military aristocracy
to show the victor as a worthy, indeed praiseworthy opponent who, underneath it
all, is ‘one of us’ in some sense.” (p. 142) In the Muslim world, on the other
hand, by the 19th century “the crusader-imperialist linkage catered
to the growing sense of victimhood across Islam….” Later, he notes, “the parallel
between the Latin kingdom of Jerusalem and Israel, which occupied much the same
territory, provided a permanent reminder of the crusading past.” (p. 152) He
notes that Saddam Hussein gave one of his divisions the name “Saladin” — and
built a statue of himself dressed as Saladin. The PLO had both a “Saladin” and
a “Hattin” brigade. The Muslim Brotherhood and ISIS to this day lay claim “to
the inheritance of Saladin and aspire to cleave a way to a new Hattin.” (p.
159)
Given the very
real fact that Hattin has, as France puts it, “become a rallying cry for
radical Islamic groups, and a factor in the politics of hate in the Middle East,”
(p. 168) anyone who wants to understand international affairs today owes it to
himself to read this book. I cannot recommend it highly enough.
The battle of Hattin is a key event in:
Defender of Jerusalem won the 2015 Chaucer Award for Historical Fiction set in the Middle Ages and the Silver for Spiritual/Religious Fiction in the 2015 Feathered Quill Book Awards.
Sounds like an interesting read. And to think; Saladin was a Kurd.
ReplyDelete