Fernandez-Morera strips away the veil created by
politically-correct modern historians to look at the real face of Muslim Spain
based on contemporary, predominantly Arab sources. Conscious that he is taking
on the entrenched academic establishment, Professor Fernadez-Morera documents
his book meticulously, quoting numerous sources for each assertion and
providing more than 100 pages of notes.
What emerges is a hideous image of brutal aggression,
consciously humiliating oppression, and intolerance on all sides (Muslim, Christian
and Jewish). This book is not a diatribe
against Islam. Rather it is a bitter and biting attack on Western historians
who in their search for an example to justify their own fantasies about
“multicultural harmony” inside Islam have ignored or consciously distorted the
facts.
For example, Fernandes-Morera quotes the following passage
from another contemporary historian: “It is important to understand that
medieval Islamic civilization had a different attitude toward slavery than that
seen in Western Europe. Slaves were much better treated and their status was
quite honorable. Furthermore, there were many career opportunities open to a
skillful mamluk [slave soldier], and the higher standards of living available
in the Islamic Middle East, meant there was often little resistance to being
taken [as a slave] in Central Asia and south-eastern Europe.” Fernandes-Morera
replies: “One can certainly imagine the throngs of girls and boys in Greece,
Serbia and Central Asia clamoring to be taken away from their families to be
circumcised, to become sexual slaves, or to be castrated to guard harems as
eunuchs, or, in other cases, to be raised in barracks with the sole purpose of
becoming fearless slave-soldiers.”
Fernandez-Morera systematically debunks the allegations of a
more “relaxed” Islam and multicultural equality. He does so by quoting Arab sources which
(among other things) brag about the wholesale destruction of churches and the
slaughter of Christian prisoners, praise the crucifixion of apostates, and texts
advising Muslims how to collect the tax from non-believers. (Make them stand
before Muslims sitting on a raised platform, call them “enemy of Allah” and
then push them around for the amusement of any Muslim “who want[s] to enjoy
it.”) He also documents the extent to which Islamic Spanish
society was dependent on slaves. For example, Abd al-Rahman had 3,750 slaves in
his court, 6,300 sexual slaves in his harem, and 13,750 slave soldiers. Furthermore, he notes that slaves
were a major export of the kingdom, particularly eunuchs (castrated Christian
males.) He documents the racism that characterized all blacks as fickle,
foolish and ignorant and valued “white” slave girls at almost 15 times that of
black slave girls.
Fernandez-Morera reminds readers that in Islamic Spain
sharia law was the law of the land, and he goes into considerable detail on the
specific form of sharia law applied, namely the Maliki school of Islamic
jurisprudence. He points out that the Maliki school, far from being
particularly liberal and tolerant, “is one of the more conservative schools,
though not the most conservative — an honor that corresponds to the Habali
school, predominant in the Arabian Peninsula.” (Fernandes-Morera, p. 96.) Fernandez-Morera points out that Maliki sharia
law included many niceties like female genital mutilation (even for adult
sexual slaves), counted a woman as half a man, and banned musical instruments
and singing altogether (as well as painting and sculpture, of course). The law
even went so far as to order a man who bought a non-Muslim sex slave and
discovered she was a singer to return her (p. 108).
Obviously, as Fernandez-Morera admits, the elites in Muslim
Spain (as all over the world) often ignored the law. Non-Muslim slave singers
and dancers were tolerated and even coveted. However, he is right to remind his
readers that lapses in the application of law do not constitute a positive
culture--much less a shining example of “paradise.”
In short, Fernandez-Morera uses the Arabic sources to enable us to picture Islamic Spain, and he applies logic and common sense ruthlessly
to expose “political correctness” masquerading as history. This book is important not just to those
interested in learning about Medieval Spain, but as a lesson in how ideology can
pervert allegedly scholarly writing. I recommend to everyone with an interest
in history and historiography.
Dr. Helena P. Schrader holds a PhD in History.
She is the Chief Editor of the Real Crusades History Blog.
She
is an award-winning novelist and author of numerous books both fiction
and non-fiction. Her three-part biography of Balian d'Ibelin won a total
of 14 literary accolades. Her most recent release is a novel about the
founding of the crusader Kingdom of Cyprus. You can find out more at:
http://crusaderkingdoms.com
Very thought provoking and concise review. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteThank you for this article. One minor clarification: painting and sculpture are certainly not forbidden by Islam as long as it is not of animate beings (humans), which could be construed as idols. "...making images of animate beings is extremely haraam and is a major sin, because severe warnings have been issued against it in the ahaadeeth. Whether the image is made to be used in a disrespectful fashion or for other purposes, it is haraam to make it in all cases, because it implies that one is trying to match the creation of Allaah, whether the image is to appear on a garment, carpet, coin, vessel, wall or whatever. With regard to pictures of trees, camel saddles, and other pictures in which no animate beings appear, these are not haraam. This is the ruling on making images. (Sharh Muslim, 14/81)." Images of plants, animals, birds, etc. are permitted, as can be seen in much ancient Islamic art.
ReplyDeleteI would also be interested in further exposition regarding the oppression perpetrated by the Jews referenced in your statement "What emerges is a hideous image of brutal aggression, consciously humiliating oppression, and intolerance on all sides (Muslim, Christian and Jewish)." Thanks for any information.