William Marshal has gone down in English
history as one of the most famous non-royal heroes of the Middle Ages. He was
famed even in his lifetime as one of the greatest knights of a knightly age and
a “flower of chivalry.”
Marshal loved and
excelled at tournaments, depicted here in a 13th century German
manuscript.
His story is better than fiction.
If his biography were not so well documented, it would be easy to dismiss the
stories about him as pure invention. But William Marshal really existed, and he
really rose from being a landless knight to regent of England by his merits. Even
his wife, through whom he became a magnate of the realm, was won by his prowess
and loyalty, for he was granted the rich heiress by the dying Henry II as a
reward for his decades of service to the Plantagenets, and the grant was
confirmed by Richard I to secure Marshal’s loyalty in the future. But in
addition to being a paragon of chivalry, Marshal was typical of his generation
in that he was also a faithful son of the Holy Catholic Church. On his deathbed
he renounced the world and took vows as a monk, a Templar monk, and was buried
in the Temple in London.
Tomb of a Knight in
the Temple of London, sometimes identified as William Marshal
He also went on pilgrimage to
Jerusalem.
Because Marshal was such a famous
knight and powerful figure at the time of his death, we are lucky to have a
long eulogy in the form of a poem or song that was commissioned by his eldest
son and intended to record his life for posterity. The poem is nineteen thousand nine hundred and
fourteen verses long, and it is a remarkable document in itself, both lively
and evocative. Perhaps even more
astonishing, the poem identifies sources and distinguishes between hear-say and
verifiable fact, points out when sources are contradictory, and recounts many
events at first hand, stating explicitly “this I have seen” in many places. The
latter suggests that the author was an intimate of William Marshal, or at least
a trusted member of his household. This document, otherwise so rich in detail,
however, tells us almost nothing about Marshal’s stay in the Holy Land.
What we do know is that William
Marshal was bequeathed the crusader cross – the vow to go to Jerusalem and pray
in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre – by his liege Henry the Young King. Henry
had taken crusader vows sometime in 1182 or 1183 – which did not stop him from
sacking churches and monasteries to pay his mercenaries. William Marshal
appears to have been a witness – if not a participant – in the sack of Rocamadour,
at which the Young King stole the sword of Roland and much other treasure. Returning from this disgraceful act, the Young
King fell abruptly ill. In a high fever and fearing for his soul at last, he
sent messengers to his father begging for forgiveness, and turned over his
mantle with the crusader cross over to William Marshal. He begged Marshal to fulfil his vow in his
stead, then lay on a bed of ashes with a noose around his neck and died. It was
June 11, 1183.
Medieval depiction of a Crusader
According to Marshal’s
biographer, William spent “two years” in Syria, serving the King of Jerusalem,
doing great deeds of arms and winning the respect of the Knights Templar and
Knights Hospitaller. However, he was back in Europe by 1187, months before the
devastating Battle of Hattin, and he brought with him two white, silk shrouds
for his own burial. He also returned
having vowed to join the Knights Templar before his own death.
Those are the only known facts we
have about William Marshal in the Holy Land, but even these facts are
intriguing. Marshall most probably reached the Holy Land, traveling by either
land or sea, in the spring of 1184. If he spent two years there he departed at
the latest in the autumn of 1186.
The Crusader Kingdoms
were defended by a network of castles such as this: Krak de Chevalliers
Those two years were years of
dramatic change in the Kingdom of Jerusalem. On the one hand, the Muslims,
which had long been bitterly divided between the Sunnis loyal to the Caliph of
Baghdad and the Shiites of the Fatimid Caliphate, had been united under the
strong and charismatic leadership of the Kurdish leader Salah ad-Din. Saladin, as he is known in western writings,
had called for jihad, and the Kingdom of Jerusalem was more threatened than it
had been since the early years of its existence. At the same time, the Kingdom
was weakened from within because the king, Baldwin IV, was suffering from
leprosy and slowly dying. His heir was a young boy, the son of his sister
Sibylla, by her first husband.
Not long after William Marshal
arrived in Jerusalem a delegation headed by the Patriarch of Jerusalem and the
Grand Masters of the Templars and Hospitallers was dispatched by King Baldwin
to the West. The delegation carried with it the keys to the Church of the Holy
Sepulcher and the keys to the Tower of Dave: effectively the symbolic keys to
the kingdom. The three men sought first the aid of Philip II of France and then
Henry II of England, begging the later to follow in the footsteps of his
grandfather, turn his Western Kingdom over to his adult and capable heir, and
take up the cause of Christendom by defending the Holy Land. If he would not do
that, the delegation pleaded, then he should send one of his sons in his
stead. One has to wonder if this was
pure coincidence of timing, or if William Marshal, who knew the Plantagenets so
well had not recommended – or at least encouraged – the appeal.
Meanwhile, Baldwin IV, in
anticipation of his death, made his vassals vow an oath with regard to the
succession. If his nephew did not live
to manhood and sire heirs of his own, they were to send to the Kings of France
and England and to the Pope, who were then to jointly name a successor. Baldwin
IV expressly excluded his sister Sybilla and her second husband from the
succession.
In the summer 1185, in the midst
of Marshal’s stay in the Holy Land, Baldwin IV died. His nephew was crowned Baldwin V, and the
High Court of Jerusalem chose Raymond of Tripoli, an able and experienced man,
as his regent. Tripoli immediately secured a new truce with Salah ad-Din.
Baldwin V, however, was sickly,
and in August 1185, with Marshal still in the Holy Land, he died. The regent
and the High Court of Jerusalem met in Tiberius to deal with the interregnum, but
the dead king’s mother and her husband staged a coup. Sibylla had herself
crowned Queen in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and placed the second crown
on her husband’s head as her consort. Her second husband was a certain Guy de
Lusignan, the younger son of a Poitivin baron and possibly an accomplice in the
murder of Patrick, Earl of Salisbury, William Marshal’s uncle.
The murder of Patrick of
Salisbury had been a highly significant episode in William Marshal’s young
life. As a landless knight in his uncle’s entourage, he had been escorting
Queen Eleanor through her own territories, when they were attacked by the
Lusignan brothers, then in rebellion against her. Accounts vary on which of the
Lusignans was present (there were four brothers: Hugh, Geoffrey, Aimery and
Guy), but there is no disagreement on how the Earl of Salisbury was killed. Namely, he was pierced from behind by a lance
when both unarmored and not defending himself.
This was clearly an “unchivalrous” blow, a despicable act, that outraged
the young William Marshal. William himself
severely wounded in the encounter, taken captive, and ill-treated by the Lusignans.
Given this history, it is hard to
imagine that William Marshal was partial to Guy de Lusignan, whether he had
been personally responsible for the Earl of Salisbury’s murder or not. (Indeed, it may have been his opposition to
Guy de Lusignan that inspired him to suggest the above mission to Henry II –
assuming he had anything to do with it.) Furthermore, Sibylla and Guy’s coup
preempted the rights of Henry II, Marshal’s liege, who should have been
involved in naming the next King of Jerusalem.
Marshal must have been appalled by their behavior, and it would probably
have reinforced his dislike for the Lusignans. Since Marshal appears to have
left the Holy Land not long after Lusignan’s usurpation of the throne, it is
probably fair to postulate that it was Lusignan’s rise to power that induced
Marshal to quit
The Holy Land.
This hypothesis is supported by
the fact that William appears to have spent his years in the Holy Land as one
of the many secular knights who temporarily served with the Templars. These knights did not take the final vows of
poverty and chastity, but for the period of the voluntary service, submitted
themselves to the discipline and Rule of the Knights Templar. Indeed, in William’s case we know that he
vowed to join the Temple – as he eventually did. The timing, however, is
significant. The Grand Master of the Templars, who had been sent to plead with
Henry II to come to the Holy Land had died during his mission and been replaced
by a man who supported Guy de Lusignan. So Marshal’s decision not to take his final
vows and stay with the Templars in their hour of need, may have had to do with
his unwillingness to serve Guy de Lusignan, leaving it to his deathbed to finally
join the Templars.
An illustration from
Matthew Paris’ “Greater Chronicle” depicting Knights Templar.
We will never know, but Marshal’s
very silence to his household and family about this episode in his life
suggests that he left the Holy Land with a bitter taste in his mouth – or
opinions he felt he should best keep to himself.
Biographies of William Marshal
available today include:
·
William
Marshal, Knight-Errant, Baron and Regent of England, by Sidney Painter,
1933.
·
William
Marshal, Flower of Chivalry, George Duby, 1985.
·
William
Marshal: Knighthood, War and Chivalry, by David Crouch, 2002.
·
William
Marshal Earl of Pembroke, by Catherine Armstrong, 2007
Recommended works of historical
fiction featuring William Marshal:
· Christian Balling’s Champion is delightful, but it only covers a tiny slice of Marshal’s
life.
· Elizabeth Chadwick’s The Greatest Knight and The
Scarlet Lion are well-researched and well-written tributes to William
Marshal.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I welcome feedback and guest bloggers, but will delete offensive, insulting, racist or hate-inciting comments. Thank you for respecting the rules of this blog.