This blog is dedicated to discussing the Crusader Kingdoms of Jerusalem and Cyprus. I will post information about the history and legacy of these remarkable kingdoms, as well as post reviews of books relevant to the crusades and the Crusader Kingdoms.
I have joined the Real Crusades History team and will posting simultaneously to the Real Crusades History Blog.
For more information visit: http://defenderofjerusalem.com
Friday, July 17, 2015
The Militant Orders in Literature - Two Reviews
Crusader by Michael Alexander Eisner
This is a melancholy, not to say morbid book. While
extremely well written and well researched with excellent characters, I found
myself just wanting to get it over with. The construction of the novel, a monk
recording a "confession," has many intriguing advantages, but knowing
from the start that the hero returned from the crusade a wreck suffering from
"demons" made me dread reading the next chapter. I knew there was
bound to be even worse to come. In retrospect, I also found the villain too
That said, this is certainly a good book, even a profound
book. This book does make you think, and the narrators are excellently drawn.
This book even has a spark of genius in it. It is more than just a story, more
than adventure or romance or mystery. It was definitely a Spanish book; I could
see, hear and smell Spain in the pages, and readers who have an affinity to
Spanish culture may like it better than I.
Yet it was too unremittingly depressing to satisfy me as a
reader. Maybe I've just been lucky, but my experience of life is of light as well as shadow, of beauty as well as ugliness, and of good as well as evil. The light, the
beauty and the good gets too little space in this book.
Silk Road by Colin Falconer
“Silk Road” by Colin
Falconer is well named because the silk road itself is the most complex, vivid
and well-drawn character of the book.
Falconer clearly did his research about the route itself – its changing
geography and climates, and the diverse and fascinating people, who lived along
it during the 13th century.
His descriptions of the route itself are vivid, informative and
evocative, as are his meticulous and convincing portrayals of Mongolian
culture, life-style and politics in this period.
Indeed, Falconer does an outstanding job of giving the
reader insight into the Mongolian mentality and ethos without romanticizing it. He is brutally honest about the repulsive
excesses – of both drink and violence – without being self-satisfied or smug. All in all, I felt he provided a balanced and
nuanced picture of this, for us, alien society. Likewise, his description of how the women’s
feet were crushed and bound in China is one of the most brutally honest
descriptions I have ever read.
Falconer does not match his very impressive knowledge of the Mongols and the
topography of Asia with equal knowledge and understanding of the Christian
world in the 13th century. He
depicts France and Provence of the 13th century as if he were
describing Norsemen half a millennia earlier – huddling around smoking fires and
wearing furs! Really? St. Louis? The man who commissioned St. Chapelle? The
popes that built the palaces in Poitiers and Avignon? Another jarring example of
his ignorance of French society is Falconer’s allegation that French women
could not inherit property. Try telling that to Eleanor of Aquitaine! Falconer appears not to have read Joinville’s
account of the St. Louis’ crusade, or he would know King Louis could not
command his Queen to so much as pay his ransom! He could ask it, not command
it. Finally, allow me a third example: Falconer
repeatedly claims that Westerners did not bathe frequently and some were “afraid”
to do so. Absurd! Bathing is described
in medieval books, depicted in medieval manuscripts and evidenced by
archeology. While the wealthy had their
own baths, the poor went to bath-houses and tips were called “bath money” not
“drinking money.” It was only after the
Reformation – and the spread of a strict morality that saw bath houses as hotbeds of sin -- that
hygiene deteriorated dramatically in European cities. Given the fact that much of the dynamic of
“Silk Road” rests on comparisons between “the West” and the cultures of the
East, this profound ignorance of Western culture destroys the power and impact
of Falconer’s alleged comparisons.
Similarly, I found Falconer’s Mongol characters vivid and
convincing. I liked his heroine Khetelun and her father very much. They came to life for me in all their
complexity and contradictions. Kubilai
and Miao-yen are likewise complex and compelling characters. But Falconer fails miserably in making
William a believable character. William
remains a caricature of heartless bigotry. Furthermore, because he is a monotone character he is completely uninteresting. I kept hoping for some nuance, some change, some insight, but
he remained flat, predictable and so boring.
Josseran eventually takes on some contours, but most of the book he is
simply a vehicle for criticizing “Western” civilization – not as it was but as
Falconer in his ignorance imagines it was.
He is obsessed with his sexuality and so in place of real dialectic with
different cultures and religions, with have shadow-boxing.
The structure of “Silk Road” had the potential to offer
provocative challenges to our understanding of Christianity, but it fell flat
because the “Christianity” of this book is an empty façade, only superficially
related to the religion itself.
Certainly there were bigots and hypocrites who called themselves
Christians and even preached Christianity, but if this book were to seriously
examine the merits of the various cultures and theologies, it would have to
portray not the counterfeit but the genuine “coin” of all the religions. It
would have to discuss the religion itself – not create a straw man of sheer
At times I had the impression that Falconer genuinely hated
Christianity, but in the end I decided he simply shied away for serious,
theological debate. It was easier to
describe the superficial differences of simplistic characters than explore the
depths of a complex theology.
In short, it’s not a bad book if you want to learn more
about the Mongols in the second generation after Genghis Khan, but beware of
the misinformation about Medieval Europe and don’t expect a genuine discussion
of the theological differences between the great religions of the period. The militant orders play a major role in my three part biography of Balian d'Ibelin. Books I and II are on sale now!