Today, before starting a series on misconceptions about women in the Middle Ages, I want to honor my namesake, St. Helena, who located the site of Christ's
grave. Below is a brief summary of her life and the story of the church erected on that site: the Church
of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem.
Helena
was a historical figure, the mother of the Emperor Constantine I "the
Great." According to most accounts she was born in roughly 248 AD in
comparatively humble cicumstances, either in northwestern Anatolia or
(less probably) in what is now the South of France. She married the
Roman officer Constaninius Chlorus, allegedly a man of equally humble
background. However, Constaninius was an ambitious man and made a
successful career. In 305 on the brink of becoming Caesar he ensured his
elevation by repudiating Helena to marry Theodora, the daughter of
Emperor Maximian.
On
his father's death in 306, Helena's son Constantine was acclaimed
"Caesar" by the Western legions, and he spent the next 18 years fighting
rival emperors Maxentius and Licinius. In 324, he finally became sole
emperor in East as well as West. Before his death in 337, he undertook
major reforms of both the Roman Army and the imperial administration. He
introduced a sound currency that was to last roughly a 1,000 years as
the "gold standard" of coinage used around the Mediterranean. Last but
not least, he established a new imperial capital on the Bosporus in
what became known as Constantinople (now Istanbul).
Yet long before his final victory over Licinius, Emperor Constantine raised his mother to the rank of Empress and had coins minted with her likeness on them. Furthermore, in 313 he (jointly
with Licinius) issued the Edict of Milan that granted religious
tolerance to Christianity. At about this time, Helena converted to
Christianity and began to actively support the Christian church.
Helena
used her status as Empress to finance the construction of a number of
churches, notably in Rome and Trier, and is credited by Church
chroniclers with great acts of charity for the poor and destitute. In
326, when she was already approaching 80 years of age, she undertook a
pilgrimage to the Holy Land.
We
know that at about this time, people living in the Holy Land began to
revere a relic which they believed was the cross on which Christ had
been crucified. According to the Church historian Rufinius writing in
403, this object was discovered after Empress Helena ordered excavations
in the environs of the Temple to Venus, known to have been erected on
the site of Christ's crucifixion by Roman emperors intent on eradicating
the worship of Christ. Early accounts say that she and the Bishop
Marcarius undertook the excavations, discovering under the porch of the
Roman temple ancient quarries or tombs. According to Rufinius (writing
less than a century after the alleged events), they found three crosses
in one of these. Taking pieces of each, they brought these to a sick
woman, who on contact with the third recovered miraculously. Thereafter,
that cross was revered as the cross on which Christ had been crucified.
It as divided into several pieces, and these were distributed to
various churches, only one being retained in Jerusalem.
Empress
Helena also located the site of the Nativity and was responsible for
the construction of a great church on this site as well. (See: Church of the Nativity) Roughly one decade later, Empress Helena died and shortly afterwards was canonized as St. Helena.
In
later accounts of the finding of the True Cross, Bishop Marcarius was
deleted in favor of a traitorous Jew and the sick woman became a dead
man brought back to life, but these legends are less important than the
fact that a great church financed by and on the order of Emperor
Constantine was constructed to mark the cite of the Crucifixion and
Resurrection his mother had identified. This became known as the Church
of the Holy Sepulcher. Modern archaeologists believe that, given the
fact that the site of the Crucifixion and Resurrection had never been
lost from sight due to early eye-witness accounts and the later
construction of the Roman temple, the Church of the Holy Sepulcher is
built on, or very near, the site of the historical crucifixion and grave
of Christ.
The
first church on this site was a monumental Greek basilica 150 meters by
75 meters, covering almost exactly the same area as the Roman temple to
Venus. This church encircled Calvary, or the site of the crucifixion,
while a rotunda beside it covered the site of Christ's grave, reached by
stairs leading underground.
This
church was burned to the ground in 614 when the Persians sacked
Jerusalem. After the expulsion of the Persians in 628 under Emperor
Herakleios, a more modest church was built on its foundations. This
second church gradually fell into disrepair during the years of Muslim
rule starting in 638, and in 969 Moslem troops set the church on fire
causing the dome to collapse. Although repaired by 984, this church was
completely leveled by the Caliph el-Hakim in 1009. A new attempt to
construct a church on the site of the crucifixion was not undertaken
until 1048, but given the status of the Christian community under Muslim
rule and their limited resources this was not a significant monument.
Only
after the re-establishment of Christian rule in Jerusalem with the
First Crusade was it possible to again construct a church worthy of the
most sacred site in Christendom. This was undertaken by the kings of
the crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem, and was consecrated on the 50th
anniversary of the liberation of Jerusalem on July 15, 1149. This new
church covered both Calvary and the Holy Grave. It is essentially this
church which we can still see today in Jerusalem. Although it has
inevitably undergone periods of decay and reconstruction, it retains the
fundamental design and many remnants of the original crusader
cathedral.
The
Holy Sepulcher was a central monument throughout the crusader period
and is therefore integral to descriptions of life in this era. For
readers tired of clichés and cartoons, award-winning novelist Helena P.
Schrader offers nuanced insight into historical events and figures
based on sound research and an understanding of human nature. Her
complex and engaging characters bring history back to life as a means to
better understand ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I welcome feedback and guest bloggers, but will delete offensive, insulting, racist or hate-inciting comments. Thank you for respecting the rules of this blog.