After
wealth, education is arguably the most powerful means of empowerment.
As I noted in last week’s essay on women and economic power,
professional skills were mobile and endowed women with independence and
self-respect. Today,
however, I want to look at abstract learning, “book-learning,” rather
than practical, professional skills. It is still common to impute
ignorance to people in the Middle Ages generally, and even more common
to assume that women were not generally literate.
Admittedly,
literacy was not as widespread or common in the Middle Ages as it is
today. There was no requirement to attend school, and for the poor, the
need to work from a very early age made schooling a luxury. It was
possible to learn a trade by watching and listening to a master, rather
than reading texts. Thus for a significant portion of society at the
lower end of the social scale, reading and writing was neither a
necessity nor particularly valuable.
Yet,
as with everything in feudal society, class more than gender determined
whether a person was likely to be literate or not. Among the classes
that valued and required higher levels of education, women were as
likely to be educated as their brothers and husbands. Indeed, some historians argue that in the early
Middle Ages among the upper classes women were more likely to read and write than their husbands and brothers. Men, they hypothesize, were too busy fighting, leaving women to provide
basic education to children while also maintaining control of the estates by doing
the book-keeping and correspondence.
For
merchants or skilled craftsmen running a business, the support of wives
in keeping the books, conducting correspondence, collecting arrears,
etc. was vital. Recognizing
this, burghers ensured that their daughters were sufficiently literate
and numerate to carry out these tasks ― or they risked having
unmarriageable daughters.
Noblewomen,
likewise, needed to be literate and numerate in order to manage their
own and their husband’s property. In fact, even in the later Middle Ages
the everyday management of a household and estate generally fell to the
lady of the house, since men were often engaged in warfare and
politics, activities that took them away from their estates, sometimes
for extended periods. The higher their status, the higher the level of
educated expected. Noblewomen could usually correspond in both their own
language and Latin. They were frequent patrons of the arts, owners of
books, and in some cases authors as well. It is no coincidence that
Eleanor of Aquitaine’s tomb shows her reading a book, while her daughter
Marie of Champagne was the patroness of Chrétien de Troyes and it was
to her that he dedicated some of his greatest works such as Yvain, or The Knight with the Lion.
Finally,
women who chose a religious vocation chose a lifestyle that revolved
around reading, writing, copying and illustrating Holy Scripture and
more. The most highly educated women of the Middle Ages were, therefore,
often found inside convents. Furthermore, by their work copying and
illuminating manuscripts, nuns played a key role (along with monks) in
preserving knowledge both sacred and secular, and in their role as
educators, they were instrumental in spreading literacy to others.
The
latter point is particularly important because it was only the wealthy
that could afford to retain tutors for the education of their young.
(Household accounts, incidentally, sometimes list women as tutors.) Thus
education often fell to parents, who might not have the necessary time,
inclination or talent for the task. Yet, it is evident that starting at
least by the 6th century AD convents and monasteries across
Europe offered education to children. Interestingly, the sexes were not
always segregated when very young; little boys were often entrusted to
the care of nuns and only later sent to monasteries or given secular
education as pages and squires. Alternatively,
particularly bright girls might be sent to monasteries to learn more or
be trained in particular skills such as singing or illumination. Also
notable is anecdotal evidence of education in the convents being
affordable as there are references to poor children attending them.
The most dramatic evidence of female education in the Middle Ages, however, is provided by the large number of women who were authors
of important works. A certain noblewoman, Dhuoda, for example, wrote an
extensive and erudite treatise on education in or about 842; the book
is full of biblical and other references that indicate this “ordinary”
noblewoman was herself very well read (and incidentally very busy). In
965, a certain Hroswitha composed a long epic poem of Otto I. In the 12th
century, there was Heloise, famous, unfortunately, more for her affair
with Abelard than the fact that she was accounted a brilliant scholar in
Latin, Greek and Hebrew before she even met him. Indeed, Abelard claims to have wanted to seduce Heloise because
of her learning ― as well as writing that he never really loved her,
only lusted after her. In her letters to him, Heloise espoused a radical
feminism that rejected both marriage and children. In the 15th century, there was the poet Christine de Pisan who in the early 15th century took on the University of Paris, mocking their misogyny.
|
Christine de Pisan with her Son |
My
personal favorite among the women of letters of the Middle Ages was
Hildegard von Bingen. She was born in 1098 and died in 1179. She joined a
convent at eight, took the veil at 15 and was abbess from 1136 onwards.
She had visions, as she describes them:
Through
God’s goodness, my soul sometimes surges up to the heights of the
heavens and the air and sometimes wanders among different peoples,
although they live in far regions and unknown places…I see them only in
my soul, and the eyes of my body remain open, for I have never fainted
in ecstasy. I see them awake night and day…The light that I see is not
local, but infinitely more brilliant than the light that surrounds the
sun.” (Cited in Pernoud, p. 43)
Yet
for all her mystical visions, she remained a highly practical woman who
wrote books on “simple” and “composite” medicine, books on linguistics,
and also composed music (which can be found on the internet today.) Furthermore,
returning to my thesis on women wielding political power (See Women and
Political Power), she corresponded with all the important rulers of her
day from Pope Eugene III to Friedrich Barbarossa and St. Bernard of
Clairvaux. Hildegard, in short, was recognized as an intellectual and
spiritual giant event by individuals themselves revered for their
learning, power, and spirituality.
The
heroines of these award-winning novels set in the Middle Ages reflect
their respective class in terms of their level of education -- from
Dowager Queens to serving girls.
For
readers tired of clichés and cartoons, award-winning novelist Helena P.
Schrader offers nuanced insight into historical events and figures
based on sound research and an understanding of human nature. Her
complex and engaging characters bring history back to life as a means to
better understand ourselves.
Question: The Crusader States never seemed to create universities however we know that the native Barons and burgers were very well educated. It appears that this was done by the clergy at the time but there couldn't have been that many private tutors. So... who were the teachers? Parents? Monasteries/Convents?
ReplyDeleteWas it mom? If so, these "Poulains" were probably better educated than most of the Western pilgrims and Knights streaming into the Holy Land.
Thanks, Doyle
PS. Please get J Stephen and do a RCH podcast.
We know that Philip de Novare learned at the "knee" of Ralph of Tiberias and later John d'Ibelin. Pages and squires benefited from education organized by their lords, and that could be in the hands of knowledgable lay persons (such as Philip himself) or clerics. In short, it was private tudors -- including native Christians, both secular and clerical -- that provided most of the education as far as we can tell.
DeleteSorry, I didn't respond to your second point above. The "poulains" may well have been better educated to the extent that they had better access to Byzantine and Arab literature and scholars, but as you also pointed out they lacked universities. So it is probably fair to say that the general level of education was higher, but for the scholarly elite it was necessary to go to Europe for "higher" education.
DeleteYou are a wealth of information. Thank you Helena.
ReplyDelete