This blog is dedicated to discussing the Crusader Kingdoms of Jerusalem and Cyprus. I will post information about the history and legacy of these remarkable kingdoms, as well as post reviews of books relevant to the crusades and the Crusader Kingdoms.
I have joined the Real Crusades History team and will posting simultaneously to the Real Crusades History Blog.
For more information visit: http://defenderofjerusalem.com
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
A Crushing Defeat over Saladin - The Battle of Montgisard
In in 1177,
Salah-ad-Din (known in the West as Saladin) launched a full-scale invasion
of the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem. It
was less than ten years since Saladin had assassinated his way to power in the
Fatimid Caliphate in Cairo, and ruthlessly suppressed numerous rebellions to
establish Sunni rule over the Shia and Coptic Christian population on the Nile.
It was only three years since the coup d’etat in Damascus by which he had
established himself in the heart of Syria but failed to take key cities such as Aleppo and Mosul that remained loyal to the son and legal successor of
Nur ad Din. Saladin had thus largely united the Caliphates of Cairo and
Baghdad for the first time in 200 years, but his hold on power was precarious.
In Egypt his faced suspicion and opposition because he was Sunni, and in Syria
he was viewed as a usurper and upstart because he was a Kurd and had stolen the
Sultanate from the rightful heir.
A Contemporary Depiction of Salah-ad-Din from an Islamic Manuscript
countered these internal doubts and dissatisfaction with his rule with the
age-old device of focusing attention on an external enemy: the Christian states
established by the crusaders along the eastern shore of the Mediterranean.
These states represented not merely a military threat to his lines of
communication between Egypt and Syria, but had also five times in the 1160s invaded
Egypt. These were not all outright wars of aggression, as the Shia Viziers had
requested Christian help against their Sunni enemies in three of the campaigns,
but the fact remained that army of Jerusalem, often aided by Byzantine fleets,
had conducted campaigns on Egyptian territory and once come close to capturing
did not simply beat the drum of alarm concerning an external enemy in order to
rally his subjects around him; he took up the cry of “jihad” — Holy War. This was a clear attempt to increase his stature
vis-a-vis his remaining rivals in Syria. Salah-ad-Din means “righteousness of
the faith,” and Salah-ad-Din throughout his career used campaigns against the
Christian states as a means of rallying support.
Another depiction of Saladin; Source Unknown
not invented jihad. The word itself
appears multiple times in the Koran, but with varying meanings. It was also
used as justification for the Muslim conquests of the 7th Century. It had, however, been largely forgotten or
neglected until Nur ad-Din, the Seljuk ruler of Syria from 1146-1174,
resurrected the concept. Most historians agree, however, that Nur ad-Din used jihad when it suited him but remained a
fundamentally secular ruler. He had, however, unleased the jinni from the
bottle and the concept of “Holy War” soon gained increasing support in the
madrassas and mosques across the Seljuk territories of the Near East. By the
time Saladin came to power there was a body of already radicalized youth eager
to follow the call to jihad.
the Kingdom of Jerusalem, King Amalaric, who had been so intent on conquering
parts if not all of Egypt, had died. He
had been succeeded by Baldwin IV, a youth suffering from leprosy. Conscious of his own weakness and immanent death, Baldwin IV sent to the West for
aid, and in early August 1177, Count Philip of Flanders reached Acre with a
large force of Western knights.
On the advice
of the High Court, Baldwin IV offered Philip of Flanders the regency of his
kingdom, whose armies were preparing yet another invasion of Egypt aided by a
large Byzantine fleet. Flanders, however, insisted on being made king of any
territories the joint Christian forces conquered. The idea did not sit well
with either the King of Jerusalem or the Emperor of the Eastern Roman Empire,
both of whom were footing the bill and providing the bulk of the troops for the
expedition. The result was that the entire expedition was called off, the
Byzantine fleet withdrew while Philip of Flanders took his knights and half the
barons of Jerusalem north to attack the Seljuk strongholds of Hama and Harim
A Medieval depiction of a Crusading Host
gathered his forces in Egypt to repel the impending attack. He rapidly learned
that not only had the invasion of Egypt been called off, the Byzantine fleet had withdrawn and the bulk of the fighting forces of Jerusalem had moved north. It was
a splendid opportunity to strike, and Saladin seized the opportunity with a
force estimated at 26,000 light horse — which leaves open the question of
whether there were infantry with Saladin or not. The force also allegedly
included some 1,000 mamluks of the Sultan’s personal body guard.
an anonymous Christian chronicler from northern Syria, the news of Saladin’s
invasion plunged Jerusalem into despair. The king was just 16 years old, had no
battle experience of his own, and his most experienced commanders (or many of
them) were besieging Hama. The Constable of the Kingdom, the competent and wise
Humphrey de Toron II, was gravely ill. But Baldwin rallied the forces he had —
according to Archbishop William of Tyre, Baldwin’s former tutor now his
chancellor and our best contemporary source , and with just 376 knights made a dash
only shortly before Saladin himself on November 22, King Baldwin took control
of the city, but could not risk open battle because of the imbalance of
forces. His dash to Ascalon may have
been heroic, but as a result Saladin could bottle up the King and his knights inside
Ascalon. This in turn meant that nothing lay between Saladin and Jerusalem except scattered
garrisons. Saladin left a force of undefined size to maintain the siege of
Ascalon and moved off with the bulk of his troops.
The Sultan and
his emirs were so confident of victory that they took time to plunder the rich
cities of the coastal plain, notably Ramla and Lydda, but also as far inland
as Hebron. In Jerusalem, the terrified population sought refuge in the Citadel
The Citadel of David as it appears today.
But Baldwin IV
was not yet defeated. With the number of Saracen troops surrounding Ascalon dramatically
reduced, he risked a sortie, rendezvoused with Templars from Gaza (although to
this day no one knows how he got the message to them) and started to pursue
Saladin’s now dispersed and no longer disciplined army. Meanwhile, he had
already issued the arrière ban, a
general call to arms that obligated every Christian to rally to the royal standard
in defense of the realm. Infantry started streaming to join him.
On the afternoon
of November 25, King Baldwin’s host of about 450 knights (375 secular knights
and 84 Templars from Gaza), with their squires, Turcopoles and infantry in
unspecified numbers caught up with the main body of Saladin’s troops at a place
near Montgisard or Tell Jazar, near Ibelin (modern day Yavne). The Sultan, as he later admitted to Saracen
chroniclers, was caught off-guard. Before he could properly deploy his troops,
the main force of Christian knights led (depending on which source you believe)
by Reynald de Chatillon, “the Ibelin brothers” or the Templars smashed into Saladin’s
still disorganized troops, apparently while some were still crossing or
watering their horses in a stream.
A modern portrayal of the Battle of Montgisard by Mariusz Kozik
battle was hard fought and there were Christian casualties, the Sultan’s forces
were soon routed. Not only that, Saladin
himself came very close to being killed or captured and allegedly escaped on
the back of a pack-camel. But for the bulk of his army there was no escape.
Those who were not slaughtered immediately on the field, found themselves
scattered and virtually defenseless in enemy territory. Although they abandoned
the plunder they had accumulated, it was still a long way home — and the rains
had set in. Cold, wet, slowed down by
the mud, no longer benefiting from the strength of numbers, they were easy prey
for the Christian residents and settlers of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. The latter, after the sack of Lydda, Ramla
and other lesser places, had good reason to crave revenge. Furthermore, even
after escaping Christian territory, the Sultan’s troops still found no refuge
because once in the desert the Bedouins took advantage of the situation to enslave
as many men as they could catch in order to enrich themselves. Very few of the
Sultan’s men made it home to safety in Egypt.
badly shaken by this defeat. He had good reason to believe it would discredit
him and initially feared it would trigger revolts against his rule. Later, he
convinced himself that God had spared him for a purpose, and he was to learn
from his defeat. He never again allowed himself to be duped by his own
over-confidence and his subsequent campaigns against the crusader states were
marked by greater caution. However, it was not until the crushing defeat of
the Christian armies at Hattin in July 1187 — almost ten years later — that he
had his revenge.
The Battle of Montgisard is an important episode in Knight of Jerusalem, the first book in a three part biography of Balian d'Ibelin.